Archive for the ‘Review’ Category

Comparing the Garmin Edge 705 and Edge 500

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Let’s take a look at the Garmin Edge 750 compared to the Garmin Edge 500. I’m sure I’ll be learning even more about the Edge 500 as it is used more on my bike. For now, I’ll focus on the dimensions and menu navigation.

At first I’ll admit that I was more comfortable using the Edge 705. It was the unit with which I was most familiar. While the joy stick is has can be annoying when trying to select a menu item (it will sometime twist when you press down moving you to another item instead of selecting one), it did provide a lot of versatility when navigating through the menus.

The Edge 500 does not have the joystick. However, once I started understand the logic of the menu and how you moved between them, it started to become second nature. If you are looking to get the 500 and haven’t had the 705, you probably won’t think anything of it.

For the most part, the units are very similar in their basic operation. The biggest changes are actually things you don’t see. For instance, the Edge 500 no longer uses .tcx files. Instead the .fit format is used. The reason for this is that the file size of the later is smaller and is a more efficient use the unit’s memory.

I have not yet been able to test this, but Garmin says the battery life on the Edge 500 is 18 hours. The Garmin 705 is supposed to have a 14 hour life. I’m one of those people who plug things in automatically so rarely go on two rides in a row without charging my units. I’ve never had any trouble with the 705 and I doubt I will with the 500 — even on longer rides.

Garmin has created a solid unit for rider who is into training and racing. The price is right. I’m sold.

Garmin Edge 500 saga continues

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

UPDATE: December 8, 5:00 PM – The official word from Garmin is that the Garmin Edge 500 requires a software update to allow for downloading zone settings to the device from Garmin Connect. They are also working on a new release of the Garmin Training Center that will include power data options. No estimated time was given for the release.

A big “thank you” to the folks at Peaksware for helping me get up and going loading my data from the Garmin Edge 500 to Trainingpeaks. After mentioning my problems on Twitter, I was contacted directly by Gear Fisher, the COO.  I was up and going in less than an hour and had several followup contacts from members of the Trainingpeaks team.

The key to working with Trainingpeaks and the new device is to have the latest Trainingpeaks Device Agent. The version that I have now is a late beta and the release version should be out soon. So far I have found the beta (Windows version only) to be pretty bug free and a great improvement over the previous version!

However, my Garmin Edge 500 issues are not over. While I have gotten my upload issues resolved, I am still having trouble getting some of the settings adjusted on the device. I am unable to set the heart rate and power zones.

With the Garmin Edge 705 you would use the device itself to input the zones.  However, the Garmin Edge 500 does not allow you to enter the zones directly into the device.  Instead, the manual instructs you to use the Garmin Connect or Garmin Training Center to configure the zones.

So, I went to my Garmin Training Center on my Mac. I did find the spot to enter the heart rate zones.  However, there was no place to configure the power zones.  Once I entered my heart rate zones, I looked for a way to get that information back to the Garmin. I searched every option and even went online searching for something I might be missing.

Zip. Zero. Nada.

Maybe the Garmin Connect online application could help. Ah, at least now I had the option to enter both the heart rate and power zones.  However, once again, I had no way to get the information back onto my Garmin.

Okay, so maybe the issue was the fact that I was attempting to do this with my Mac.  Maybe only the latest Windows version would allow me to configure my Garmin with the Training Center. I went to Garmin.com to download the application. Finally I gave up as the download would hang every time. Currently, I am waiting to hear back from Garmin support.

I do like the device and I’m looking forward to describing some of the features that I like.  However, I’ve got to get through these issues before I’m ready to give it an enthusiastic review. Really, it isn’t the device itself so much as it is how the device interacts with its support mechanisms.

I realize that I am an early adopter and in today’s world this is just how products come to the market. Hopefully, any readers who are looking to purchase the device will find these issues resolved before their units arrive.

Then again, maybe I am just dumb and am missing an obvious option here. If you have any information that could help me get my zones put into my Garmin, I would appreciate it.

Garmin Edge 500 incompatible with Trainingpeaks

Monday, December 7th, 2009

UPDATE: After publishing this article earlier this morning, I checked my Twitter account to find Gear Fisher had sent me a link to what appears to be a beta Device Agent program. I say beta because I have not seen it available on the Trainingpeaks website. However, the program worked beautifully (on my Windows machine) and I was able to get my data uploaded. Not sure when the new device agent will be widely available. Stay tuned…

After finishing my first ride with the Garmin Edge 500, I was ready to upload my data to Trainingpeaks.com. Being familiar with the Edge 705, I didn’t think twice about connecting my 500 and drilling down the directory structure to find my history file to upload. Problem is… it wasn’t there.

With the Garmin Edge 705 you would find the file and then upload it to Trainingpeaks.com or open it directly in your WKO+ software. The files containing the data have a .tcx extension. It was a system that worked just fine.

Now, I was searching in vain for the .tcx files. Finally I found a file with the .fit extension that appeared to be dated at the time I rode. There was a second one from the day before when I tested the Garmin Edge 500 for the first time.

Next I tried the Trainingpeaks Device Agent. It kept telling me that there was no Garmin connected to the computer. Finally, I went online to see if I could get some help. There was none to be found. The only thing I found was the following press release.

Cyclists who purchase Garmin’s new Edge 500 GPS-based cycling computer, available later this year, can upload workout data to TrainingPeaks software.

Garmin Edge 500Lafayette, CO, September 18, 2009 – Peaksware today announced that purchasers of Garmin’s newest innovation in GPS technology, the Edge 500 cycling computer, will be able to upload workout data directly to TrainingPeaks training and nutrition software. All workout data recorded by the Edge 500, including anything from a paired ANT+ compatible heart rate monitor, speed/cadence sensor or power meter can be saved, analyzed and shared using a free or premium TrainingPeaks.com account, or for further power and GPS data analysis by using TrainingPeaks WKO+ desktop software.

“TrainingPeaks is excited to add Garmin’s newest cycling computer to our list of more than 80 compatible training devices,” said Donavon Guyot, CEO of Peaksware. “Compatibility with the Edge 500 cycling computer means cyclists, from the elite to the beginner, can continue to seamlessly use TrainingPeaks as their one source for tracking all of their training and routes.”

Designed for the performance cyclists, the Edge 500 cycling computer tracks speed, distance, time, position, elevation, calories burned, and power when paired with an ANT+ compatible power meter along with other data. Workouts uploaded from the Edge 500 cycling computer to TrainingPeaks can be saved and analyzed over time as well as shared online with a coach or with friends on Facebook and Twitter.

Cyclists can upload workout data from the Edge 500 cycling computer directly to either a free Basic or Premium TrainingPeaks.com account, as well as export the data to TrainingPeaks WKO+ desktop software for advanced power and GPS data analysis. Visit www.trainingpeaks.com to create an account or get a free trial of WKO+ software.

My request to Trainingpeaks.com support was an automated response letting me know that they would be glad to help me during their regular business hours. Seems I was stuck. I’m not an impatient person and I don’t mind waiting. However, I was supposed to get my data up for my coach to analyze and it would be nice to know whether I should keep looking or just wait.

I then got word from Elizabeth with Peaksware.  “So sorry about the confusion with the Edge 500,” she wrote in an email. “We are certainly working on adding to our list of over 80 compatible training devices. We have had a slight delay in developing the direct compatibility we had announced in anticipation of the release of the Edge 500, but we are definitely working on it.”

That answered my question. I’ll be going back to my 705 for future rides until this issue is resolved. My initial experience with the device on the road (which I had wanted to write about today) was positive. However, if you are thinking of purchasing the device for the purpose of recording your power and uploading it to Trainingpeaks.com, you might want to wait a bit.

Garmin Edge 500 bike mount video

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

My morning didn’t go so well. My time on the trainer left me feeling pretty sore. Then I settled down to watch UNC play Kentucky just to find my Heels losing badly (though they came back gamely toward the end).  It was a bit of a bright spot to see a package delivered to my front door.  I figured it would be my new Garmin Edge 500.

Comparing the Garmin Edge 705 with the 500

Comparing the Garmin Edge 705 with the 500

I opened the package and let it charge while I finished watching the game. Then it was off down stairs to mount it on the bike. If the rest of the experience goes as well as that installation, I’m sure I will be very happy with the computer.

As you can see in the above picture, it is much smaller than the 705.  That is the first positive when it comes to mounting the device.  However, the best thing about it is the way the new twist-disk attaches to the bike.

Instead of the cable ties that you had to use to connect the click on 705 mount, the 500 gives you a number of rubber bands (much like come with bike lighting kits).  These bands can be secured to the four corners of the disk (disks have corners? well these do) and wrap around the stem.  No more cutting cable ties if you want to move the computer from one bike to another.

Speaking of multiple bikes, the 500 came with two mounts.  So, I can have one on my white TCR Advanced and have another one ready for when I build up my black TCR Advanced frame.  Nice.

You can watch the below video to see exactly what it looks like and how it works.  It is pretty slick.  I like it.  Of course, I’ve got to take it out on a ride for the final test.  I’ll be reporting more here later.

Right now, I have to head out for a progressive dinner with the beautiful redhead’s family.  I’ll have to give the Garmin Edge 500 a further test tomorrow.  Thanks, Garmin!

The planets have realigned

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Late last evening I looked out my front door to find a small box that had been delivered by UPS. I instantly knew what it was, but as I opened the door to grab it I hoped it wasn’t a Christmas present ordered by the Beautiful Redhead for one of the Things Three. Ah, joy, it was what I thought it was… my refurbished Garmin Edge 705!

I’m really thankful that John James has let me use his PowerTap for about three weeks now. Frankly, I think he has enjoyed not having the computer connected to him when he’s riding. I’m glad to get him back on the ball-and-chain.

Me? I’ve been out of sorts because my Garmin busted right as I was starting a serious attempt at training with power. That is why John’s generosity was so important. Thankfully I didn’t miss a single session.

Still, it was weird using a system that I didn’t understand. It took me a while to feel comfortable with the PowerTap computer. I was always afraid that I would clear it when I went to set an interval. It was also very different from large display Garmin.

As soon as I got the box open, I cranked up the computer and configured it. Then it was down to the office where my Giant with its Quarq CinQo was sitting in the trainer. I popped the 705 into its mount and then spinned the crank. Nothing happened at first so I started to go through the 705 settings to rescan. Before I could get there the alert popped up that the powermeter had been found!

Hurrah!

Today I’ll swap out the PowerTap rear wheel with my own and return the PowerTap wheels, wires, and head to John. Things will now be back to normal. Sure, it is a small thing, but when you are starting out on something new — something you are not sure of — it is good to have something comfortable be part of the process.

I do have to say that after using the PowerTap, I am very happy with the Garmin display. With eight possible configurable panels on the display (and a possible 16 with a simple switch)  it is very easy to have as much or as little information as you desire. That is going to be nice!

On the PowerTap I would have to scroll through the selections in order to see the cadence and the time elapsed. Since one of the things Jim is working with me is my cadence (yes, it is too low) I need to be able to keep an eye on it. At the same time, I need to keep an eye on the time elapsed for my intervals. The PowerTap head made that a challenge.

My Garmin screen will be configured with three display panels: 1) watts, 2) time, and 3) cadence.  On the second display that you can access by tapping the joy stick will have other information such as time of day, average watts, average cadence, etc.  Not only that, but a single push of a button will start my intervals.

Once again I find myself very pleased with the CinQo-Garmin combination. It isn’t that the PowerTap did not do the job. The data I received was not noticeably different. However, the ease of use and configurability of the former wins out in my experience.

Finally, once again, a big thank you to John James and Sunshine Cycle Shop. They have been taking care of me for over ten years now and I know they have my back. They can have yours too!

Keep your eyes open – your life depends on it

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

It is true that I nearly killed myself last Saturday.  Well, not really, but I felt like I was going to die.  Most likely you aren’t going to die from riding your bike.  However, it pays to keep your eyes open or you might die while riding your bike.  I was reminded of this Monday evening.

The desire to ride certainly wasn’t there, but I knew if I didn’t get back on the bike it would take even longer to recover from Saturday’s ride.  My muscles were sore and stiff.  They needed some spinning to help get them limbered up.

It worked.  I went out for a very easy spin that ended up leading me to Cleveland Park.  I finished up an easy 20 mile ride just doing laps before heading home.  By the time I was finishing I was in a much better frame of mind and my body was actually feeling pretty good.

It was on the final lap of the park that I had an experience that left me shaking.  Now, I don’t think it typically would have, but I have had so much trouble on the bike this season that I had an interesting reaction.  I started shaking and had trouble catching my breathe.

The scene of my near miss

The scene of my near miss

I was coming from left to right on Cleveland Park Drive.  As I approached this traffic configuration, I had a car coming toward me as well as a car coming toward the intersection on Richland Way (the road running from top to bottom).  Actually, Cleveland Park Drive ends here and turns into Richland Way.

I was in the lane with the right-of-way.  The car coming on Richand Way has a yield sign at the intersection.  You can see the dotted white line on the road indicates this.

The car caught my attention for two reasons.  One – it looked like my in-law’s car, and two – he was coming with a bit of speed and wasn’t slowing very quickly.  That really got my attention!

My brain did the calculations and it was clear that we would probably reach the intersection at the same time.  I assessed what was happening around me – a car coming toward me in the opposite lane, a car behind me, and this car.  I then put all my focus on this vehicle.

First, I tried to get eye contact with the driver.  He wasn’t looking at me.  That was not a good sign.  Second, I checked to see what type of route I could take by making sure where I could go to avoid any other vehicles while avoiding him.  Last, I bored in on him with my focus.

Sure enough we reached the intersection at the same time.  I could tell what he was doing.  He had focused on the car in front of me and was timing his arrival at the yield sign so that he could step on it once the car passed.  He wasn’t seeing me at all.

I started an evasive maneuver to my left as he encroached on my lane.  All this time I was looking him in the eye – or trying to catch his eye.  Then he saw me and I saw the look of surprise in his eyes.  He put on brakes and turned his wheel to the right.  Thankfully, this kept me from having to swerve into the oncoming lane.  I was able to adjust my line to avoid him without crossing the yellow line.

It all happened in a matter of seconds.  I kept going and he came up beside me.  He rolled his window down and apologized.  I just waved my hand and let him go.  It was right after that I started shaking.  I was definitely time to go home.

Bottom line is he would not have hit me.  I was more than prepared to avoid him.  However, what if I had not been paying attention?  What if I had assumed that the guy driving the car saw me and would stop at the yield sign?  There is no doubt in my mind he would have hit me.

We as cyclists must be always aware of what is happening around us.  We can never assume we know what a driver is going to do.  We can never trust in the laws of the road to keep us safe.  All it takes is that one person not obeying the laws to cause us injury.

Now, having said all that… I have ridden thousands and thousands of miles.  This is the second time in all of those miles that I have had this happen.  There have been many more near misses in a car.  So, before you tell me to get off the bike because it is too dangerous, consider that it is dangerous any time we go on the road – bike, car, motorcycle, or what have you.

Be safe out there! Be aware!

Riding in style and fast by the mile

Friday, August 21st, 2009

Gave the Giant an over haul yesterday.  It started with the shifters and ended with me rolling out the door to test some Zipp 202 tubeless wheels.  I rolled out on my Thursday night ride with an illegal bike.

At 6.4 kilograms (14.12 pounds) the Giant was slightly under the legal weight limit according to UCI rules.  But hey, I wasn’t racin’, I was just out for a ride with the guys.  The only illegal activities we were worried about was us rolling through a stop sign. (If you are a cyclist in Greenville right now, you know what I’m talking about.)

First, the shifters – that is how this all started.  I love the SRAM group.  However, I have broken two of the shifters in the same spot over the last couple of months.  Yes, both times were when I have wrecked.  I do believe that the shifters could avoid this weak point with a little different engineering.  The nice folks at SRAM said they would “take it under advisement.”

They also sent me a new pair of shifters.  Sure, I had to pay $200 for them, but they are 2010.  They are pretty sweet looking – borrowing some of the styling cues from the the SRAM Red group – and are slightly lighter than the 2009 pair I broke.

2010 SRAM Force shifters

2010 SRAM Force shifters

The action is crisp.  Of course, as my teammate Reece is often heard to say, “Ah, new cables, it’s like getting a brand new bike!”  How much of the improved feel was due to the new cables and tune up and how much was due to the design of the new shifters, I don’t know.  All I do know is that I was flying through those gears with a minimum of motion.

Did I mention they look cool? Throw in some red bar tape, hoods, and cable housing and we’ve got a little bling action going.  It even matches my new seat.

The 2010 Specialized Body Geometry Toupe Team saddle (that is a mouth full!) is an improvement on my favorite saddle.  I love the Toupe saddle because it is a minimal carbon saddle that gives a comfortable ride because the carbon flexes.

2010 Specialized Toupe saddle

2010 Specialized Toupe saddle

The only problem I had with my previous saddle was that all my wrecks had torn up the edges of the saddle and it was beginning to tear up my shorts.  After one ride on my new saddle I realize another issue I had with the 2009 Toupe without realizing it.  The 2010 model gave me a noticeably better ride.

The reason for the better ride is the material used to make the seat.  The previous model was leather and was quite slippery.  You found yourself sliding around on the seat.  Sliding is the enemy of a comfortable posterior!  This model held me in place while keeping the flex that I had come to enjoy.  It has something to do with the “micromatrix” material used to cover it.  It is a noticeable improvement – in a case where I didn’t think one was necessary.

Oh yeah, those wheels.  The Zipp 202 carbon wheels with tubeless tires made my bike as light as a feather.  If I had purchased them, I would have found my bank account to be light as a feather!  Still, it was fun to try out something so light without the guilt of spending a couple grand on them.

Zipp 202 carbon wheels

Zipp 202 carbon wheels

What I liked… these things are fast.  I had to be careful as I was following other riders because the wheels got up to speed fast and then held it.  I was coming up much faster on leading riders as we rode out in a double pace line.  Improved acceleration was noticeable and the rolling resistance minimal.

Climbing was also done with ease – relatively speaking, of course.  The problem with was that several times I think I over did it as I tested out the wheels and was pretty much worn out by the time I reached Paris Mountain.  That is  when I really wanted the wheels to give me an advantage.

We had ridden over 25 miles by the time we started up and we had been smokin’ fast up to that point.  We slowed just a bit before reaching the bottom because Billy had fallen back – he had been fighting stomach issues.  John with Barley’s happened along and paced him back to us.

Typically after an effort like that it takes me between 13 to 13.5 minutes to climb Altamont.  I did the first half last night in 5 minutes and 40 seconds.  However, about 9 minutes in I knew I was in  trouble.  Still, I have to say things would have been much worse without the wheels.

I was on The Wall when I looked down to see my computer read 12 minutes 3 seconds.  There would be no PB for me tonight.  I could have pushed it and pulled off a 12:30.  That is a minute faster than normal for this ride.  However, I didn’t see the need and just sat up and meandered over the KOM line.

What I didn’t like about the wheels was the roughness of the ride.  They didn’t seem as rough as I had been led to believe they would be, but it certainly was not as smooth as my current wheels.  The braking on the carbon rim was also an issue.  It was, as I put it, herky-jerky. They were also noisy.  They seemed to flex and rub on my brake pads when I was under load.

Now, it could be that this was all because I had put these wheels on for just this test.  Perhaps some of the noises I was hearing would have cleared up had the bike been dialed in specifically for the wheel set.  Certainly, these wheels were made for climbing!

The primary thing that would keep me off of them would be the price.  They are so expensive, I would be near a panic attack each time I would ride them in a pack.  I also think that even with the added weight, I would prefer an aluminum braking surface.

One mean Giant machine!

One mean Giant machine!

It was great fun to climb on what seemed essentially to be a new bike.  Yep, Reece, what you say is true, “New cables… It’s like having a brand new bike.”  Oh, don’t forget about that new seat!

Three’s company with the 2009 Honda Fit

Friday, August 7th, 2009

One of the most searched phrases that brings folks to LowCadence.com is “Honda Fit Bicycle“.  It would appear that lots of people like their Honda Fits and want to be able to stick their bikes in the back.  I’ve done it and you can as well.

However, what happens when you want to take more people in your car AND your bike — or maybe three bikes and three people?  That is when you need a bike rack.  Here is some video of how I do it.  Using this arrangement, you can carry three bikes (two on top and one inside) along with the driver and two passengers.

Of course, you could load more bikes by adding a third to the top.  The problem is, you wouldn’t have room for a fourth rider!  With three bikes on top, you could also leave the bike out of the inside and give yourself some more room inside.

I was happy to find the Yakima generic rack system fits well on my car.  So, whether you are looking to store your bike inside or outside the Honda Fit, it is a perfect fit.

A Versus commercial I actually enjoyed

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

During the Tour De France I enjoyed watching the action on the Internet live feed.  It was good to get it in real time, but also it allowed me to avoid the commercials. However, there were some times when I did see some commercials during the evening “expanded coverage.”  There was one I would have liked to have seen again, but I only saw it once.  Now, thanks to YouTube, I get to.

Anyone know who the narrator is? It seems I should know who it is… but that might be the point, they got someone with a voice that rang familiar.  It has the sound of an seasoned coach giving a pep talk before a big game.  If you know who it is, please leave a comment.

On some wheels and a hope

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009

Sunday I determined that Monday evening would be an assault on the mountain.  What that means is there would be an all out effort to reach the top in under 12 minutes.  If you’ve read LowCadence.com for any amount of time, you are familiar with this Don Quixote effort undertaken by yours truly numerous times in the past.  This time I had a new weapon.

Since I was out of town for the weekend, I left my bike at Sunshine.  So I sent John a text asking him if the test wheels they had were available and if I could use them for my attempt.  He responded that they were available.  He also let me know that my replacement shifter was in.  Now I should be all set for the climb.

The wheels are Shimano’s RS Eighty carbon/alloy.  This would be my first ride on carbon wheels.  It was my hope that the wheels would either 1) actually help me go faster up the mountain, or 2) make me think I could go faster up the mountain.  Supposedly the light wheels should spin faster and give me an edge.

I started off and immediately got caught in a downpour.  The rain continued until I was a quarter of the way up the State Park side of the mountain.  At least I felt a bit cooler – even if a bit soggy.

The wheels were okay.  There did seem to be a difference between them and my normal training wheels – a set of Ksyrium Elites.  It is true that the wheels seemed to “spin up” more quickly.  They also seemed stiff enough and the ride was smooth.

My only negative was that the rear hub was making annoying noise.  Of course, this being a test set that had been ridden before, I figured there might be some wear.  However, it did make me wonder about the longevity of the construction.

Soon I was over the top and starting down the Furman side.  That is when I really noticed a difference with the wheels… and it scared me!

I’m not sure if I am describing this correctly, but when descending the wheels made me feel top heavy.  They were definitely faster than my Mavic wheels.  Several times I felt as though the bike was running away from me and going into the turns I didn’t feel the same level of control.

Now, I’m not saying that is a bad thing.  It is just different.  It was something I had to adjust to.  Frankly, I was surprised, because I was counting on the wheels making a difference on the climb — not the descent.

Then it was time to turn around and start back to the top.  I set my Garmin to read from the Quarq CinQo only the Average Watts, Current Watts, and Average Speed.  I knew I would need to average somewhere near 330 watts to make my goal.

Click picture to enlarge.

Click picture to enlarge.

As you can see from the graph, the first two-thirds of the climb I was able to keep the wattage up.  The places where it dipped during that period were spots where the road leveled out a bit and I was spinning at a higher cadence, but still getting more speed.

Where things went south was in that last third of the climb.  I had lost my ability to accelerate and settled into a steady output.  I was still averaging over 300 watts during this section, but it was still pulling down my overall average.  Of course, I wasn’t really paying attention to the computer at this point.

You can see that I gave it a bigger effort as I hit The Wall.  In that 700 feet section, I climbed over 70 feet in elevation with an average of a 10% grade. At the very end it kicks up to a 16% grade.  It took 52 seconds to cover that 700 feet.

My new wheels and the hope that they would help carry the day came up 18 seconds short.  That puts me right up there with my best times (best time so far is 12:05 with many other attempts landing in the 12:15 range).  If I compare my times on my best wheels (Ksyrium SLs), then the carbon Shimano wheels would come in about even.

I think I’ll stick with my Mavic wheels.  The RS Eighty wheel set looks nice.  The wheels ride nice.  However, I don’t think they really made me any faster than I go on my SLs.  Plus, the Ksyriums feel a little more stable to me.  Perhaps it is just the comfort of the known, but going into a turn on a fast descent I’d prefer the feel of my wheels.  On the climbs?  I really did not notice that much of a difference between the Eighties and the SLs.