<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Low Cadence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lowcadence.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lowcadence.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts of a cyclist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:24:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Here is the plan for 2012 Ride for Mike by barry burden</title>
		<link>http://lowcadence.com/2012/05/17/here-is-the-plan-for-2012-ride-for-mike/comment-page-1/#comment-7305</link>
		<dc:creator>barry burden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcadence.com/?p=4547#comment-7305</guid>
		<description>you can count me in too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can count me in too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time-Crunched Cyclist Plan: the result by Mark Farrell</title>
		<link>http://lowcadence.com/2012/05/21/time-crunched-cyclist-plan-result/comment-page-1/#comment-7300</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcadence.com/?p=4560#comment-7300</guid>
		<description>Excellent write up Jonathan. I&#039;ve really enjoyed following your progress and was interested to read the background to why you choose the TCCP. 

Mark (currently in week 7 and hoping to take part in first race at some point).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent write up Jonathan. I&#8217;ve really enjoyed following your progress and was interested to read the background to why you choose the TCCP. </p>
<p>Mark (currently in week 7 and hoping to take part in first race at some point).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Here is the plan for 2012 Ride for Mike by Matt</title>
		<link>http://lowcadence.com/2012/05/17/here-is-the-plan-for-2012-ride-for-mike/comment-page-1/#comment-7288</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcadence.com/?p=4547#comment-7288</guid>
		<description>A century ride for a good cause - count me in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A century ride for a good cause &#8211; count me in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on He won&#8217;t grow up to be a cowboy by Mark Farrell</title>
		<link>http://lowcadence.com/2012/05/15/he-is-not-a-cowboy/comment-page-1/#comment-7287</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcadence.com/?p=4536#comment-7287</guid>
		<description>Nice post. Would be interested to hear why the racing lifestyle isn’t really one you want him to follow!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. Would be interested to hear why the racing lifestyle isn’t really one you want him to follow!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time-Crunched Cyclist Plan is over by Mark Farrell</title>
		<link>http://lowcadence.com/2012/05/14/time-crunched-cyclist-plan-in-over/comment-page-1/#comment-7277</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcadence.com/?p=4529#comment-7277</guid>
		<description>Hi Jonathan,

Thanks for the reply. Sorry didn&#039;t mean anything negative with the exclamation! :)

Take your point on the hill allowing you to produce higher wattage although not on this statement: 

&quot;I would have to do an 8 minute effort at 380, take a rest between intervals and then do a second 8 minute effort at 380. Not sure I could pull that off.&quot;

I&#039;m pretty sire the field test just takes the highest of your two back to back tests. If one is lower than the other it doesn&#039;t matter as far as the test is concerned. You just use the higher one. If you are holding back at all on the first of the two tests you won&#039;t get a valid 8 min max.

I definitely won&#039;t be stopping @ 6 weeks. Actually think I am making some good gains, but just hard to tell. I&#039;m on strava as well btw if you wanted to follow my progress.

Looking forward to your blog update. Keep up the good work!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jonathan,</p>
<p>Thanks for the reply. Sorry didn&#8217;t mean anything negative with the exclamation! <img src='http://lowcadence.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Take your point on the hill allowing you to produce higher wattage although not on this statement: </p>
<p>&#8220;I would have to do an 8 minute effort at 380, take a rest between intervals and then do a second 8 minute effort at 380. Not sure I could pull that off.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sire the field test just takes the highest of your two back to back tests. If one is lower than the other it doesn&#8217;t matter as far as the test is concerned. You just use the higher one. If you are holding back at all on the first of the two tests you won&#8217;t get a valid 8 min max.</p>
<p>I definitely won&#8217;t be stopping @ 6 weeks. Actually think I am making some good gains, but just hard to tell. I&#8217;m on strava as well btw if you wanted to follow my progress.</p>
<p>Looking forward to your blog update. Keep up the good work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time-Crunched Cyclist Plan is over by Jonathan Pait</title>
		<link>http://lowcadence.com/2012/05/14/time-crunched-cyclist-plan-in-over/comment-page-1/#comment-7276</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Pait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcadence.com/?p=4529#comment-7276</guid>
		<description>Mark, don&#039;t confuse those numbers with FTP. If I could have held that for at least 20 minutes then you would have reason to exclaim! Also, consider that I was climbing, which helps you produce higher watts because gravity is working with (against) you. In order for it to be a valid CTS Field Test, I would have to do an 8 minute effort at 380, take a rest between intervals and then do a second 8 minute effort at 380. Not sure I could pull that off.

However, I do plan to do a field test here soon. It actually isn&#039;t recommended in the book, but I just have to do it! I want to know. I want to report it here on the blog as well. Before I do it though, I want to give my body some time to rest.

Finally, don&#039;t stop 6 weeks in! I remember at that time I was wondering if it was making any difference. Basically, your body is building up to critical mass when you will finally see a break through. Just keep training as close to the book as possible. I think you are going to see progress in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, don&#8217;t confuse those numbers with FTP. If I could have held that for at least 20 minutes then you would have reason to exclaim! Also, consider that I was climbing, which helps you produce higher watts because gravity is working with (against) you. In order for it to be a valid CTS Field Test, I would have to do an 8 minute effort at 380, take a rest between intervals and then do a second 8 minute effort at 380. Not sure I could pull that off.</p>
<p>However, I do plan to do a field test here soon. It actually isn&#8217;t recommended in the book, but I just have to do it! I want to know. I want to report it here on the blog as well. Before I do it though, I want to give my body some time to rest.</p>
<p>Finally, don&#8217;t stop 6 weeks in! I remember at that time I was wondering if it was making any difference. Basically, your body is building up to critical mass when you will finally see a break through. Just keep training as close to the book as possible. I think you are going to see progress in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time-Crunched Cyclist Plan is over by Mark Farrell</title>
		<link>http://lowcadence.com/2012/05/14/time-crunched-cyclist-plan-in-over/comment-page-1/#comment-7274</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcadence.com/?p=4529#comment-7274</guid>
		<description>380 average wattage for 12 mins! That is some power output. Wasn&#039;t your 8 min test averaging close to 300 when you started the program? Will be interesting to hear how you get on with the retest @ 8 mins. I&#039;m at week 6 and not really sure how much progress I&#039;ve really made. Tempted to try and test again now, but will probably wait until the end of the program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>380 average wattage for 12 mins! That is some power output. Wasn&#8217;t your 8 min test averaging close to 300 when you started the program? Will be interesting to hear how you get on with the retest @ 8 mins. I&#8217;m at week 6 and not really sure how much progress I&#8217;ve really made. Tempted to try and test again now, but will probably wait until the end of the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time-Crunched Cyclist Plan is over by Jonathan Pait</title>
		<link>http://lowcadence.com/2012/05/14/time-crunched-cyclist-plan-in-over/comment-page-1/#comment-7263</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Pait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcadence.com/?p=4529#comment-7263</guid>
		<description>Robert,

I agree. The plan even points out that this is the tradeoff.

However, for me it is simple... I don&#039;t have 12 to 16 hours to spend a week on the bike. This plan gives me hope that I can at least participate in the fun with 7 to 8 hours a week. Though I would like to get stronger over the long haul, I realize that is not reasonable for my greater goals in life. It ends up being a compromise for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>I agree. The plan even points out that this is the tradeoff.</p>
<p>However, for me it is simple&#8230; I don&#8217;t have 12 to 16 hours to spend a week on the bike. This plan gives me hope that I can at least participate in the fun with 7 to 8 hours a week. Though I would like to get stronger over the long haul, I realize that is not reasonable for my greater goals in life. It ends up being a compromise for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time-Crunched Cyclist Plan is over by Robert Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://lowcadence.com/2012/05/14/time-crunched-cyclist-plan-in-over/comment-page-1/#comment-7262</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcadence.com/?p=4529#comment-7262</guid>
		<description>The old volume vs. intensity decision. Low training hours mean you have a lot of time for recovery, so you can do more intensity. Your FTP and VO2 should go up after 9-12 weeks of higher intensity work, with ample recovery time between sessions so you hit the wattage targets.

The tradeoff is a long term one. Without the additional training time below the first lactate turnpoint (the top of zone 2), your aerobic foundation won&#039;t be improving much, which in turn will cap how high your peak values can be. In other words, the Time Crunched plan will get you fit quickly and help maintain that level for 8-10 weeks (after that point, your fitness will degrade, as it will on any training program without a change in stimulus for 8-10 weeks), but you won&#039;t get stronger over several seasons of low volume, high intensity. Also, you probably won&#039;t see a second peak during the year (unless you can do a stretch around the 20-week point of higher volume/lower intensity to rebuild Base and improve fitness below the first lactate turnpoint).

Now, if getting stronger over the long haul is not a goal, and you want to make the most out of very limited time on the bike, then trading intensity for volume is the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old volume vs. intensity decision. Low training hours mean you have a lot of time for recovery, so you can do more intensity. Your FTP and VO2 should go up after 9-12 weeks of higher intensity work, with ample recovery time between sessions so you hit the wattage targets.</p>
<p>The tradeoff is a long term one. Without the additional training time below the first lactate turnpoint (the top of zone 2), your aerobic foundation won&#8217;t be improving much, which in turn will cap how high your peak values can be. In other words, the Time Crunched plan will get you fit quickly and help maintain that level for 8-10 weeks (after that point, your fitness will degrade, as it will on any training program without a change in stimulus for 8-10 weeks), but you won&#8217;t get stronger over several seasons of low volume, high intensity. Also, you probably won&#8217;t see a second peak during the year (unless you can do a stretch around the 20-week point of higher volume/lower intensity to rebuild Base and improve fitness below the first lactate turnpoint).</p>
<p>Now, if getting stronger over the long haul is not a goal, and you want to make the most out of very limited time on the bike, then trading intensity for volume is the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time-Crunched Cyclist Plan is over by Jonathan Pait</title>
		<link>http://lowcadence.com/2012/05/14/time-crunched-cyclist-plan-in-over/comment-page-1/#comment-7261</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Pait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcadence.com/?p=4529#comment-7261</guid>
		<description>Yes, the plan is best used with a power meter, but a heart rate plan is in there as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the plan is best used with a power meter, but a heart rate plan is in there as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

